People’s chances of dying from certain infectious diseases before vaccines were introduced were extremely rare. So rare that if it weren’t for the drug industry’s disease mongering, we wouldn’t be discussing this subject. The chances of anyone being harmed by these “vaccine preventable diseases” are so small that it’s not even worth worrying about. In many cases, you have a higher chance of being struck by lightning or a meteorite than harmed by these “life threatening diseases”.
Before Vaccines
Pertussis (whooping cough) vaccine introduced in the late 1940s. Fatality or harm before vaccine was 1 in 77K or 99.9987% not effected by virus.
Tetanus vaccine introduced in the late 1940s. Fatality or harm before vaccine was 1 in 200K or 99.9995% not effected by virus.
Diphtheria vaccine introduced in the late 1940s. Fatality or harm before vaccine was 1 in 83K or 99.9988% not effected by virus.
Polio vaccine introduced in the 1955. Fatality or harm before vaccine was 1 in 100K or 99.999% not effected by virus.
Rubella vaccine introduced in the late 1963. Fatality or harm before vaccine was 1 in 1M or 99.9999% not effected by virus.
Measles vaccine introduced in the 1963. Fatality or harm before vaccine was 1 in 500K or 99.9998% not effected by virus.
Chickenpox vaccine introduced in 1995. Fatality or harm before vaccine was 1 in 2.3M or 99.999957% not effected by virus.
Mumps vaccine introduced in the late 1967. Fatality or harm before vaccine was 1 in 2M or 99.99995% not effected by virus.
Hepatitis B vaccine introduced in 1991. Fatality or harm before vaccine was 1 in 1.4M or 99.999929% not effected by virus.
Haemophilus Influenza Type B vaccine introduced in 1985. Fatality or harm before vaccine was 1 in 600K or 99.999833% not effected by virus.
In the US, every “vaccine preventable disease” was nearly eradicated, then several years later the drug companies introduced vaccines and gave credit to them for what sanitation, hygiene, and nutrition achieved.
Source:
1) Vital Statistics in the United States, 1940-1960, US Department of Health, Education, and Welfare
2) Historical Statistics of the United States—Colonial Times to 1970, Part 1.
𝑨𝒏 𝑰𝒏𝒄𝒐𝒏𝒗𝒆𝒏𝒊𝒆𝒏𝒕 𝑺𝒕𝒖𝒅𝒚
In 2016, journalist Del Bigtree issued a challenge to the head of infectious disease at one of the most prestigious medical institutions in the world: conduct the most thorough vaxxed vs. unvaxxed study that has ever been done. The expert took up the challenge and ran the study to prove Del wrong. That study never saw the light of day... until now.
Following the release of An Inconvenient Study, several outlets—including Henry Ford, The Conversation, and Stat News—published criticisms of the unpublished vaccinated versus unvaccinated study at the heart of the film. ICAN responds in order to address valid limitations and invite open scientific debate free from censorship or fear. The following page addresses these criticisms. Science demands questions and debate, not silence.
19th Century (1800s)
19th and 20th Century contrarians opposed the delusions of vaccines by pointing out the ineffectiveness and dangers they caused.




















